TED: Daniel Pink on the surprising science of motivation

He doesn't use this term, but this fits into the paradigm of behavioral economics.

"Computer People"

Source: imgs.xkcd.com
    This is great.    

The Savanna Principle | Psychology Today

Source: www.psychologytoday.com

Cell tower causes mysterious ailments... while shut off? : Yahoo! Tech

Source: tech.yahoo.com
If you're going to get all hysterical about cell phone towers causing you medical harm, make sure you have your facts straight. ...

Reminds me of the vaccines cause autism "controversy." Never let the evidence get in the way of your beliefs!

Does a Price Tag Have a Taste? | Psychology Today

Source: www.psychologytoday.com
 
Some months back, while roaming Berlin's famous "Kaufhaus des Westens" - an over-glorified shopping mall - my friends and I had a little contest about who could find the most expensive bottle of wine within 2 two minutes. Although I don't remember who won - which means it probably wasn't me  - I remember the winning wine costing more than a thousand Euros (which feels like 50 billion $US these days). A price tag like that makes me wonder: How big of a difference does quality in wine really make? Is there a real 985$ difference in taste between the 1000$ wine and a comparable 15$ wine?

Andy McKee performing "Hunter's Moon"

Andy McKee performs Hunter's Moon from his new album "Joyland" Pre-order "Joyland" at http://www.amazon.com/Joyland-Andy-McKee/dp/B0037ZNRJQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1266335428&sr=8-1

So awesome. Can't wait for the new album.

Wired: What Is Time? One Physicist Hunts for the Ultimate Theory

SAN DIEGO — One way to get noticed as a scientist is to tackle a really difficult problem. Physicist Sean Carroll has become a bit of a rock star in geek circles by attempting to answer an age-old question no scientist has been able to fully explain: What is time?

carroll_mug2
Sean Carroll is a theoretical physicist at Caltech where he focuses on theories of cosmology, field theory and gravitation by studying the evolution of the universe. Carroll’s latest book, From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time, is an attempt to bring his theory of time and the universe to physicists and nonphysicists alike.

Carroll sat down with Wired.com on Feb. 19 at AAAS to explain his theories and why Marty McFly’s adventure could never exist in the real world, where time only goes forward and never back.

Wired.com: Can you explain your theory of time in layman’s terms?

Sean Carroll: I’m trying to understand how time works. And that’s a huge question that has lots of different aspects to it. A lot of them go back to Einstein and spacetime and how we measure time using clocks. But the particular aspect of time that I’m interested in is the arrow of time: the fact that the past is different from the future. We remember the past but we don’t remember the future. There are irreversible processes. There are things that happen, like you turn an egg into an omelet, but you can’t turn an omelet into an egg.

And we sort of understand that halfway. The arrow of time is based on ideas that go back to Ludwig Boltzmann, an Austrian physicist in the 1870s. He figured out this thing called entropy. Entropy is just a measure of how disorderly things are. And it tends to grow. That’s the second law of thermodynamics: Entropy goes up with time, things become more disorderly. So, if you neatly stack papers on your desk, and you walk away, you’re not surprised they turn into a mess. You’d be very surprised if a mess turned into neatly stacked papers. That’s entropy and the arrow of time. Entropy goes up as it becomes messier.

So, Boltzmann understood that and he explained how entropy is related to the arrow of time. But there’s a missing piece to his explanation, which is, why was the entropy ever low to begin with? Why were the papers neatly stacked in the universe? Basically, our observable universe begins around 13.7 billion years ago in a state of exquisite order, exquisitely low entropy. It’s like the universe is a wind-up toy that has been sort of puttering along for the last 13.7 billion years and will eventually wind down to nothing. But why was it ever wound up in the first place? Why was it in such a weird low-entropy unusual state?

Amazing read.

Did Google Save a School?

"The world has sped up in a lot of ways, and I think education hasn't."

I'm a big proponent of Google Apps for Education. It's collaborative, portable, free, and frees up IT resources for more constructive work. I also advocate 1:1 laptop programs.

That said, Google did not "save" the school. The administrators, teachers, and support staff did. Google provides some great free tools, but simply changing from paper and pencil to MacBook and Google Docs doesn't change learning by itself. Frontline is playing into a common fallacy in education: that technology is the end, rather than the means to an end. Technology has to be fully integrated into curriculum, and curriculum has to become dynamic and innovative in it's exploitation of technology. Teachers have to be trained, students have to be trained, new policies have to be crafted, and IT has to support an enormous increase in network usage and new hardware. Google doesn't do that. This school appears to be improving, but we need to dispel of this technology fallacy in order to properly evaluate schools without getting caught up in shiny new computers.

The bigotry behind the word 'retard' - washingtonpost.com

Source: www.washingtonpost.com

TED: Kevin Kelly tells technology's epic story

Had to watch this twice to absorb it all. It's a fascinating way of looking at the universe.

Syndicate content Syndicate content